Nature Vs Nurture Book. The nature versus nurture debate involves the extent to which particular aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (i.e., genetic) or acquired (i.e., learned) influences. Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture.
Nature can be said to be given whereas nurture can be said to be learned. Nurture states that feelings, ideas, and human behavior are innate or learned. The nature versus nurture debate is about the relative influence of an individual's innate attributes as opposed to the experiences from the environment one is brought up in, in determining In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism). nature VS nurture.
In this sense, nature is continually pushing for nurture to sync up with it.
If genetics didn't play a part in the development of our personalities, then it follows that fraternal twins reared under the same conditions would be alike regardless of differences in their genes.
Those who find the environment a big influence in change could possibly find that change is much easier. But of the two, in humans anyway The nature Vs nuture debate on human behaviour is ridiculous. The nature versus nurture debate poses a very complicated scientific question: how do scientists figure out which one plays a greater role in the development of a person?