Nature Vs Nurture Philosophers. It just want to create a stereotypical generalization for all rather than looking at the details of the truth. The nature vs. nurture debate is often described as one of the big philosophical and scientific questions facing psychologists.
In the nature versus nurture debate, the term "nature" refers to the genes we inherit while the term "nurture" refers to our outside environment (Nature vs. Nature is what we think of as pre-wiring and is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors. Those who think they were born with a personality, belong to the side of nature, and the rest of the philosophers go to the nurture supporters.
Similarly, the philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau theorised that people were born essentially good.
Some philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggested that certain things are inborn, or that they occur naturally regardless of environmental influences.
There has always been a large controversy over whether inherited genes or the environment influences and effects our personality, development. Anyone who feels we are strictly hereditary beings have little hope for change. If genetics didn't play a part in the development of our personalities, then it follows that fraternal twins reared under the same conditions would be alike regardless of differences in their genes.