Nature Vs Nurture Experiments. The nature versus nurture debate involves the extent to which particular aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (i.e., genetic) or acquired (i.e., learned) influences. The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology.

Those who find the environment a big influence in change could possibly find that change is much easier. The nature versus nurture debate is about the relative influence of an individual's innate attributes as opposed to the experiences from the environment one is brought up in, in determining In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism). If genetics didn't play a part in the development of our personalities, then it follows that fraternal twins reared under the same conditions would be alike regardless of differences in their genes.
The fraternal twins experiment also supports the nurture position.
It took philosophers many years to make sense of the matter.
The nature versus nurture debate is about the relative influence of an individual's innate attributes as opposed to the experiences from the environment one is brought up in, in determining In the "nature vs nurture" debate, nurture refers to personal experiences (i.e. empiricism or behaviorism). Here are some experiments that were tested to answer the nature versus nurture debate. Nature refers to these characteristics that are innate.





